Sunday 30 November 2014

Vladamir Propp's character types

  1. The villan—struggles against the hero
  2. The donor—prepares the hero or gives the hero some magical object
  3. The (magical) helper—helps the hero in the quest
  4. The princess and her father—gives the task to the hero, identifies the false hero, marries the hero, often sought for during the narrative. Propp noted that functionally, the princess and the father can not be clearly distinguished
  5. The dispatcher—character who makes the lack known and sends the hero off.
  6. The hero or victim/seeker hero—reacts to the donor, weds the princess
  7. False hero —takes credit for the hero’s actions or tries to marry the princess.
These character types usually conform to the classic Hollywood narrative, it would seem that these roles would work best in a fantasy/ SIFI film. However independent films can be traced back to these character types E.g Skyfall:

James Bond- hero
Q- donor
Kincade- the helper
Eve Moneypenny- the princess
M- dispatcher

Some indie films will try to subvert these to try and add realism to its narrative.


COM: sim/diff with VFV Macro + Micro

Children of men walking with the baby:
Themes,style and representation of gender

1.theo is a protective farther figure, mother is seen as a sacred figure
2. Dystopia, war
3. Tracking shot, POV 

Is likely to be an independent film because the ending is open and challenges us to think. This doesn't conform to the classic Hollywood narrative. 

This film represents masculinity as being the main power in the film. Due to women not being able to give birth they're redundant of all power in government and in society 

In V for Vendetta war is seen as a tool of peace and enables the audience to take a side, where Children of Men uses war as a backdrop to a more important point in the story, war is shown as an object of destruction and is not shown in the way a Hollywood film would; where good triumphs over evil. The difference between VFV and COM is that VFV is a hollywood film.

Thursday 13 November 2014

Comparative Essay Children Of Men and V For Vendetta

Both films are set in dystopian future where society is run by a corrupt government. However Both films mainly focus on different aspects of a totalitarian state, for instance Children of men looks at infertility within women and its effects on society where as V for Vendetta looks at a corrupt government who abuses power and how no one has enough courage to stand up to it.

One similarity that both films share is a dystopian future set in London under control by a fascist government with both governments intentions of making Britain a 'pure' country. Both films actively speak against foreigners living in Britain, It also goes against homosexuals and religions that aren't seen as white religions such as Hinduism and Muslims. This is a well known aspect of Fascism and has been used during Hitler's rule of Germany. However how both governments got into power is different. Extremist political parties are voted in in times of crisis this is no different in these films but in COM the crisis is a unexplained natural problem where as VFV is a biological war created by the government on its own people to create chaos.

Another similarity these two films share is the theme of revolution, both films use the means of a violent uprising/ revolution to achieve freedom. In VFV the people of London are inspired to revolt because of Vs actions, it could be seen as a peaceful protest as they move to the House of Parliament without causing no harm, but with parliament being blown up it is seen as a violent protest. They do this for freedom from government and the fascist regime. This is similar to COM where the revolution of the ghetto is unquestionably a violent uprising. The reason for the war within the ghetto is also for freedom but for immigrants or 'undesirables'.

Another similarity between the two films is the idea of conspiracy theories, they are used by the government in both films to strengthen popularity, to create cahos to simply restoring order to show strength and it could be said that they did it for population control. In VFV the government created a chemical and planted it in water systems in 3 areas to create panic and chaos and then cure the problem to simply gain popularity. The government blame terrorists for the attack so it maximises popularity. This is not to different in COM where the government blame attacks on the public on 'terrorist groups' who are actually 'freedom fighters' who do not use violence anymore. This is used by the government to maintain faith in its regime. These events are also not to similar to reality with conspiracy theories focused on 9/11, where the government causes a catastrophe to use as a reason for actions that suit the government.

A difference between the films is the theme of infertility in COM. This theme is the main focus and drive point for all the characterss especially the protagonist ( Theo ). The cause of the problem within women is unexplained so it is impossible to identify it with any other themes within either films. Where as the main driving point for the protagonist in VFV ( V ) is revenge, he shares this anger with the society within london in the film to spur an uprising.

Overall I belive the films Children Of Men and V For Vendetta are very similar in the themes they show or use. The only difference between the films is the driving point for the protagonist.